Published weekly

December 7, 2006

Page 1   This week's print edition   Sun Dial briefs Advertising in The Alpine Sun Staff

Back Country boards unite against SDG&E’s Sunrise Powerlink project  

By Christy Scott

The Alpine Sun

     BACK COUNTRY — Planning group members and residents from Campo and Lake Morena voiced their opposition to a proposed energy power line that could cut a swath of gigantic conduit towers along routes through the Back Country. The board voted unanimously to oppose the project, in agreement with other community groups in the Back Country.
     San Diego Gas & Electric’s Sunrise Powerlink, if completed as envisioned by the utility, the electric transmission line would stretch 150 miles from Imperial County and cost about $1.3 billion to construct. The towers in question needed to carry the transmission line would be 125 feet tall and 105 feet wide at their base.
    SDG&E would prefer to build the 150-mile Sunrise Powerlink across the northern part of the county through the Anza-Borrego State park, but the California Public Utilities Commission, which will make the final decision, has asked the utility to consider other routes.
     “The PUC has told us that we have to look for another route,” said Nick Pince, of SDG&E, to the Boulevard board and residents. “They want us to find a route that doesn’t go through the Anza-Borrego State Park.”
     The alternative routes outlined by the utility all travel through the southern Back Country and along the border.
     “I want to stress that SDG&E has already rejected these routes in preliminary studies because they are too costly, and don’t meet the demand that we want,” Pince said.
     SDG&E says the three alternative southern routes it reviewed are undesirable because they are close to a power line that has been knocked out of service by fire 23 times in the past decade. Having a second power line so close increases the risk that both could go out of service in a disaster, negating the main reasoning for the Sunrise routes.
     One route crossing through Pine Valley would require condemning more than 50 homes. Another route crossing through Descanso would require the condemnation of more than 40 homes.
     The preferred route would also cross more than 20 miles of Anza-Borrego State Park, but would not uproot any homes or families.
     “We want to make sure we avoid impacts to private property, in particular housing units, houses, barns, ranches, so as much as we can we want to avoid impacts to structures that were already out there before we started the process,” said Sunrise project representative JC Thomas at the Boulevard meeting.
     “If you look at San Diego county, it is a checkerboard of land-use constraints that we need to avoid,” Thomas said. “Some of them are people’s homes, some of them are parks, some of them are forests, some of those are tribal lands, it is very difficult to get from that end in Imperial Valley to San Diego.”
     The Sunrise Powerlink is opposed by many in the communities where the line could cross. It is also opposed by environmental groups who do not want the wires to cross Anza-Borrego Desert State Park.
     Planning groups in Boulevard, Pine Valley and Campo have voted to deny the Sunrise project in its entirety, including all alternative routes. All of the groups have also sent letters to the California Public Utilities Commission stating their positions. Groups in Descanso and Jacumba also expressed discontent after presentations by SDG&E representatives regarding the powerlink.
     “Our community already bears the burden of the existing 500kv Southwest Powerlink, which impacts many homes,” read a letter from the Boulevard group.
     One major concern is the necessity of the new line, which has been questioned by many groups and individuals.
     “It’s a false choice,” said Sierra Club representative Kelly Fuller, of Alpine, regarding the alternative routes. “Anywhere they’re going to do this, it’s just not needed.”
     The Sierra Club, which opposes the power line, said discussion about the different routes is spurious because SDG&E should be focusing on alternatives to building a power line, such as better conservation and more local renewable energy.
     “There’s talk of a study that SDG&E has not done, which is, is this really even needed,” said Campo resident Mike Thometz. “There’s enormous questions within the industry and a lot of other places, whether this is needed… there’s no facts, no certainty — they say they need it and that’s it.”
     SDG&E argues that the new transmission line is needed to keep up with energy demand in the region. According to SANDAG projections, the San Diego region’s population will grow from 3 million to 4 million by 2030. The utility maintains that the region needs extra power to avert a shortfall early next decade.
     SDG&E also maintains the project is needed to start developing solar and geothermal power near the Salton Sea in Imperial County. Under a new state law, the San Diego utility and other California utilities must obtain at least a fifth of their electricity from non-fossil-fuel sources beginning in 2010.
     “They’ve really got the cart before the horse here,” said Boulevard group chairwoman Donna Tisdale. “They haven’t even started the permitting process for any of the energy production in Imperial Valley…. They’re really pushing the politics of this, but they don’t have the basics of the project. That’s basically why Boulevard voted against the project.”
     Proposed for completion in 2010, the project would deliver 1,000 megawatts to the region, or roughly one-fourth of what it currently uses on the hottest days. A megawatt is the standard measuring unit of electricity and is generally enough to keep the lights on in 750 to 1,000 homes. But much more energy is needed during the summer.
     The Draft Environmental Impact Study on the project is due to be completed by August 2007, and the commission is expected to decide whether to grant San Diego Gas & Electric Co. a license to build the 150-mile power line by January 2008.
     Back Country residents are asking for the California Public utilities Commission to hold meetings in local communities regarding the Sunrise Powerlink routes before making any decisions.
     In Campo, residents can view a copy of the 800-page scoping report for the Sunrise Powerlink project at the Campo/Morena Village Library.
     An open-to-the-public meeting and scoping workshop for the project will also be held on Dec. 13 from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. at the Al Bahr Shrine, 5440 Kearny Mesa Road in San Diego. For more information call (858) 292-0092.

For information about the Sunrise Powerlink project click here.


                                                E-mail Christy Scott


Page 1   This week's print edition   Sun Dial briefs
Advertising in The Alpine Sun Staff
If your business isn't showing up in the search engines, you need to call us!