Supervisors approve revision of county
groundwater ordinance
By Joe Naiman
The Alpine Sun
SAN DIEGO — During
the Jan. 31 meeting of the San Diego County Board of
Supervisors, the supervisors unanimously approved revisions to
the county’s groundwater ordinance.
“They’re much improved over what exists,” said
Supervisor Dianne Jacob. “The groundwater in the Back Country is
extremely important, and it is a finite resource.”
The ordinance amendments only apply to proposed
subdivisions and do not restrict building on existing undivided
parcels.
“The groundwater ordinance applies only to
discretionary permits, not to existing legal lots,” said county
Department of Planning and Land Use deputy director Eric Gibson.
“The application of the ordinance is specifically limited to
discretionary land use permits.”
A boundary adjustment is a discretionary action, but a
late addition to the amendments stipulates that only boundary
adjustments with the potential to impact the groundwater
situation will be subject to the ordinance.
The county’s groundwater ordinance was reviewed in 2006
by county groundwater geologist Jim Bennett and by a Groundwater
Technical Advisory Committee, which was established by the
Department of Planning and Land Use.
“Overall there’s been a good discussion within the technical
advisory committee, and we’re all in support of the proposed
changes,” said advisory committee member John Peterson of
Peterson Environmental Services.
The review identified two revisions that could protect
groundwater resources by verifying that a long-term sustainable
supply was available to serve proposed development. One of those
revisions changes residential well test requirements while the
other revision added boundary adjustments to the list of
discretionary projects subject to the groundwater ordinance.
“I think they’re needed, and I think it will be good,”
said Larry Johnson, who co-chairs the Groundwater Subcommittee
of the Campo-Lake Morena Community Planning Group.
The ordinance had required analysis of a given well’s
performance capabilities but did not analyze long-term yield.
The ordinance had required between one and five well tests,
based on the number of proposed lots in the development, for
subdivisions outside of a water service area for which
groundwater use was proposed.
The new ordinance allows the director of the DPLU to
require additional well tests beyond the additional amount
required, which may verify a long-term sustainable supply for
potentially marginal lots in steep-slope areas which typically
have relatively less groundwater in storage than valley areas.
The previous capacity standards for a well required
production of no less than three gallons per minute, recovery of
90 percent of total drawdown within 12 hours of termination of
production, and production of at least two full well bore
volumes (a bore volume is the quantity of water stored within
the saturated portion of the well’s drilled annulus). The 90
percent drawdown requirement was replaced with two new criteria
to analyze long-term yield.
One criteria will analyze the amount of residual
drawdown projected from the well test to indicate whether the
well is located in an aquifer of limited extent; if a
consequential amount of residual drawdown is projected the
long-term yield may be lower than what the well test would
indicate.
The second criteria projects whether the well would
have sufficient water after five years of pumping at the rate of
projected water demand; that conservatively assumes that no
groundwater recharge occurs during that period and thus accounts
for a worst-case drought scenario.
The long-term yield tests create a minimum 24-hour time
period of well production to perform reliable analysis, although
tests with a specific capacity of at least 0.5 gallons per
minute per foot of drawdown may be terminated after eight hours
of production.
The changes were welcomed by Dulzura widow Judy Swift,
who is trying to subdivide her 16-acre lot into two eight-acre
parcels so that her daughter can live nearby.
“The county ordinance is a little antiquated,” Swift
said.
The new ordinance also requires well tests to be
performed under the direct supervision of a state-recognized
professional geologist, which eliminates registered drilling
contractors or pump contractors from performing the work and
submitting well test reports. Drilling or pump contractors can
still perform the field work if they are under the direct
supervision of a professional geologist.
The county’s justification for the professional
geologist requirement was that many tests submitted by drilling
or pump contractors resulted in inadequate data collection or
analysis and required additional tests.
“I understand the need for the professional geologist
and the need for the data,” Johnson said. “It does bring into
focus the added cost of the geologist… It’s a good intent as
long as it doesn’t go too far.”
The new ordinance also requires boundary adjustments to
comply with minimum parcel lot sizes for areas outside of a
water service agency, which are based on mean annual
precipitation and range from four acres for more than 21 inches
of precipitation to 20 acres for less than nine inches. Boundary
adjustments, which do not reduce the lot size of existing lots
created at smaller sizes, will be permitted.
“We certainly applaud this ordinance. We think it’s a
tremendous step forward,” said Michael Thometz of Campo.
Thometz added that water quality should be part of
future ordinance changes.
Jacob noted that communication to the public will be
required and that further refinements may be warranted.
“I know we’re far from being done,” she said.
|