Published weekly

October 23, 2008

Page 1   This week's print edition   Sun Dial briefs Advertising in The Alpine Sun Staff

Students stand up against GUHSD partisanship  

By 
Lori Bledsoe
The Alpine Sun

     EL CAJON — Students bravely spoke out, with frustration, anger, and concern at the Oct. 16 Grossmont Union High School District board meeting as issues arose over many of the board members’ direct support of Proposition 8. In addition, the Environmental Impact Report for the 12th district high school is still on going as Proposition H funds end and projects enter into closeout processes, but new venues to build with fewer headaches begin to surface.
     In the opening of this meeting, Board President Larry Urdahl introduced speakers, which included several students who courageously approached the board with clear and concise statements concerning the boards’ decision to announce support for Proposition 8. Each one of these speakers pointed out to the board that it was not their position as a public board to politically support or not support such an issue. Each student in turn, reminded the board that as a school board, their concern was for educational issues, and by supporting this particular proposition, they failed to remain neutral, and specifically alienated students in their district.
     Katie Wright, the Project Manager, presented the ongoing status of Proposition H. Wright said that as the funds in Proposition H near complete committal, on-going projects are entering the final closeout phase, which means they are in completion. GUHSD with the help of Gafcon/Harris is aggressively moving forward with the closing of 82 projects.
     Wright introduced to the board another way to contract construction during this time of modernization and renovation. The lease/leaseback option has been used by other districts that have revitalized their facilities with bond funds. As Wright explained, this lease/leaseback option allows the district some versatility in the choice of contractors as well as the contractor’s liability in the project.
     As it stands now, the district, by law, must choose the lowest bidder when choosing a contractor for a project. This contractor however is not always the best choice for the project, and even though the bid contract is low, the ending result may have many overruns. The lease/ leaseback option allows some protection against this.
     Larry Urdahl weighed in on this, saying that the lowest cost contract is not always economically sound when you have about 87 percent in overruns.
     Wright said that they were using this option for one out of eight of the new science buildings that were beginning to proceed into the planning phase. Urdahl questioned why the district wasn’t using this procedure for any of the other building projects and Scott Patterson said that this one project was the ‘test case’.
     Patterson said that this test case would provide data on potential savings as well as what he called the ‘headache factor’. If this test case is successful, it would open up opportunities to use this option in future construction projects.
     Wright then touched on the Environmental Impact Report for the 12th high school that has been in process since 2007. This on-going study is currently in process on the three sites that GUHSD has declared probable building sites for the 12th high school, Wright’s Field, the Lazy A Ranch, and Chocolate Summit.
     Wright is anticipating a completion of the required studies by December 2008, and expects to see a released draft of the EIR by January 2009. Wright explains that this report is a lengthy study on biological, technical, and cultural issues of all three areas.
     As the studies progress, findings on the different sites can and have initiated new studies. For instance, any hazardous materials findings will initiate a new study, as well as any cultural findings, which include actual remains or pottery. Biological studies tend to take time, as researchers must visit the sites during seasonal habitations.
     Each of these areas in the study causes the study to take time. Nevertheless, as Wright also explained, this study will be thorough, and ‘bullet-proof’. When the EIR is presented, it should be able to survive any challenges made to it.


                                                E-mail the Editor


Page 1   This week's print edition   Sun Dial briefs
Advertising in The Alpine Sun Staff
If your business isn't showing up in the search engines, you need to call us!