Published weekly

June 11, 2009

Page 1   This week's print edition   Sun Dial briefs Advertising in The Alpine Sun Staff

EPA investigates toxins at
Granite Hills High School
 

By Grant Madden
Original Investigation

     EL CAJON — Parents of students at Granite Hills High School located in El Cajon, have been stunned to learn that the school is the subject of an Environmental Protection Agency toxicology investigation. Granite Hills is one of the major high schools that Alpine regional students attend.
     On Monday, March 30, parents of students received a plain unmarked business envelope, with no return address or identifying particulars, advising them of an information evening on Wednesday, April 1, at the high school. Enclosed in the envelope was a fact sheet and brief synopsis from the California Department of Toxic Substances (DTSC) advising that during preparations for classroom extensions at the school, a number of soil samples were taken. The soil samples were reported to contain high levels of arsenic, and a volatile organic compound, Butadiene.
     Arsenic is a naturally occurring mineral that is used in the mining process for gold. It is responsible for the epidemic water poisoning in a number of South East Asian countries. In the United States there is a correlation between arsenic to skin and bladder cancer. Epidemiological studies have suggested that consumption of tap water with arsenic poisoning may also be linked to type 2 diabetes.
     Butadiene is a petroleum based product predominately used to make synthetic compounds and rubber tires. Exposure to the gas will lead to the onset of blurred vision, vertigo and tiredness, before eventually damaging the central nervous system. Butadiene is a known carcinogen, directly involved in the promotion of cancer and the increase of its propagation.
     The Department of Toxic Substances reports they were first notified of the toxins in March 2008. An area of about 1.3 acres at the high school was cordoned off using a chain link fence to prevent intrusions by students and the District engaged the DTSC to conduct a preliminary environmental assessment of the contamination, at an estimated cost of $17,884.
     The School District was subsequently informed by the DTSC, in a letter dated June 26, 2008, that in accordance with the State Education Code, the District is mandated to inform residents of the toxic contamination.
     In July 2008, the preliminary assessment was received by the DTSC and on Aug. 19, the DTSC issued their comments. The preliminary assessment established the strongest source of the contamination adjacent to the chain link fence, less then eight feet from a classroom building and parallel to a common walkway still in use by students.
     No further attempt was made by the School District or the High School to cordon off the classrooms, or to temporarily relocate portable classrooms to vacant land owned by the school, away from the contamination source.
     Included in the preliminary assessment was an abridged history of the contaminant site. From 1928 until approximately 1958, the high school was originally farmland where pesticides and fertilizers were used. Sometime between 1967 and 1970, the area of contamination was partially developed as Granite Hills High School. The Preliminary Assessment also made reference to previously existing structures erected on the site, some of which contained lead based paint.
     The DTSC reported that during their geotechnical investigation, undocumented fill was located 3.5 to 8 feet below the surface, and that arsenic was detected in surface soil at a level that required mitigation. The report was forwarded to the school district in August 2008 for their comment.
     The Grossmont Union High School District Board failed to respond the DTSC, and in November 2008, the DTSC instructed the District that the hazardous material would pose a threat to public health, and it required further investigation and the removal of the hazardous material.
     In January 2009, the School District finally entered into a cleanup agreement with the DTSC regarding the hazardous materials, at a cost of almost $40,000. District School Superintendent Robert Collins eventually informed some parents of the hazardous material in a letter dated Jan. 16, 2009, 10 months after the initial findings and seven months after being instructed by the DTSC to advise residents.
     In that letter, Collins asserts that, “preliminary tests indicate that the chemical was not detected inside or outside of the classrooms.” His statement contravenes the actual results of the DTSC, which in November 2008 had pinpointed the strongest concentration mere feet away from existing classrooms.
     Despite the fact that in June 2008 the DTSC had advised the school district of mandatory disclosure of the hazards, many parents report that they had no knowledge of the toxins prior to the letter of March 30, 2009, and that they had not received the District’s letter dated Jan. 16. In addition, the secretary to Principal Kelly Madden of Montgomery Middle School, located diagonally across the road from Granite Hills High School, reports that they had no knowledge of the toxins at all.
     On Tuesday, March 31, telephone and e-mail inquiries to both the Environmental Protection Agency and the Department of Toxic Substances were not returned, both Departments closed in observances of Caesar Chavez Day. Both agencies had still not responded to inquiries by the close of business at the end of the week.
     On Wednesday, April 1, a small group of about 60 people turned out to the public meeting chaired by Shahir Hadded of the DTSC. He stated that the DTSC was responsible for overseeing the investigation and clean up of school sites where toxic substances are identified.
     DTSC Project Manager, Angela Ortega outlined the results found to date, and confirmed that the contamination is restricted to the proposed science building site. She stated that there is currently no threat to human health from the hazardous substances, but that a response action and additional monitoring is required to prevent future threats.
     Doctor Bill Bosan, a toxicologist at the DTSC addressed the audience outlining which chemicals were detected and the dates of detection. He presented a risk assessment on the potential exposure to the toxins. Using the concentrations recorded at the site, he estimated that a four-year student at the school had a cancer risk of approximately one in 1 million. The number is more significant for faculty, nominating their cancer risk as one in 100,000.
     Doctor Bosan stated that there were a number of uncertainties with the butadiene detected at the school, including an unknown source, the sporadic levels in monitoring, and the effect of shallow groundwater. He recommended the incorporation of vapor barriers as part of the new building construction, and the continued investigation of the toxins.
     The meeting was then opened to a question and answer style format, where a number of proponents emerged. The first was the faculty of the high school, chiefly concerned with the delay to have their long awaited science building erected during the forthcoming 2009 summer break.
     Representatives of the Grossmont School District were also present, as they clarified procedures for the administration of the toxin removal. Subject to a formal review of public comments in relation to the cleanup, administrators calculated that construction of the new science building might begin as early as July 4, 2009.
     Very few parents of students were present; the greater representation coming from parents whose children will be freshmen students attending Granite Hills High School later in the year.
     “I just want to know if it’s safe for my children to attend,” one unidentified parent cried in aguish.
During open discussions, Granite Hills Principal Georgette Torres mentioned that a student had recently been taken to hospital with reported butadiene poisoning. In addition, she stated that faculty at the high school have reported a higher then normal level of cancer over the past decade.
     Doctor Bosan was specifically asked what measures were being taken to track the health of those persons who may have been exposed to the toxins. He stated that the tracking of medical ailments was not the role of the DTSC, and suggested that responsibility lie with the Public Health system. He indicated that the DTSC had no intention to “look back” and examine those who may have been previously exposed.
     In addition to Principal’s Torres one unconfirmed incident of butadiene poisoning and the elevated levels of cancer among staff, there is a history of unaccounted illness in former students of the school.
     In the Granite Hills graduating class of 2008, a number of senior students reported suffering long-term symptoms throughout their final year, similar to those experienced by exposure to butadiene. One student was subsequently referred to the California Infectious Disease Unit when their ailment was unable to be diagnosed.
     On Thursday, April 2, inquiries were made with the office of Dianna Jacob, Supervisor of the Second District for the County of San Diego. A representative of that office reported that that the Second District was unaware of the public meeting.
     The San Diego County Department of Environmental Health, the local board that oversees environmental quality and hazardous materials, was also not represented at the meeting.
     While GUHSD representatives demonstrated that their primary concern was to hasten construction of the new building, and the DTSC is focused on the current hazard and mitigating exposure in the future, the ignorance of exposure to the chemical toxins prior to the March 2008 detections may still become a liability issue. If the undocumented fill is determined to be the source of the contamination, the implication is that every faculty and student, past and present, of Granite Hills High School, may have been poisoned with a cancer-causing chemical. Inquiries are continuing to ascertain how many unaccounted illness may be attributable to exposure from the toxins.
     The Grossmont Union High School District will eventually submit a Removal Action Workplan (RAW) to the DTSC, which will be subject to a 30-day public comment period.
     Despite the assurance given by the DTSC toxicologist Doctor Bosan that the contaminated site was now “safe”, he stated that the actual source of the toxins had not yet been identified. In addition, he also recommended future monitoring for butadiene.
     Even with the DTSC identifying the highest source concentrations, the school district has made no effort to extend the exclusion zone. The chain link barrier fence still exists around the original open area of level ground, and students are still walking between classes in close proximity to the poisonous gas source.


                                           
E-mail the Editor

Page 1   This week's print edition   Sun Dial briefs
Advertising in The Alpine Sun Staff
If your business isn't showing up in the search engines, you need to call us!