|
CPUC
temporarily blocks
SDG&E power shut-off plan
By Christy
Scott
The Alpine Sun
Last week, the California Public Utilities
Commission (CPUC) temporarily blocked San Diego Gas & Electric’s (SDG&E)
plan to shut off power to parts of East County and the Back Country
during periods of high winds to prevent wildfire.
The CPUC voted 3-2 to issue a temporary restraining
order preventing SDG&E from implementing the shutoff plan until the
regulatory body has a chance to fully review the proposal. The CPUC
has scheduled a hearing on SDG&E’s plan for Sept. 10.
The utility had planned to begin implementing the
shutoff program this week, beginning Sept. 1, when extreme weather
conditions, including high winds and low humidity, create an
accelerated risk of wildfire.
Specific conditions that would trigger the shutoff,
according to SDG&E, are a “red flag” fire warning from the National
Weather Service, sustained winds of at least 35 mph or sustained
winds of at least 30 mph with gusts of at least 55 mph, a humidity
level under 20 percent, and moisture levels below 6 percent for dry
brush and 75 percent for live plants.
“This kind of proactive power shutoff during extreme
weather events, we think … is prudent,” said SDG&E spokeswoman
Stephanie Donovan. “We think it can help to prevent catastrophic
wildfire.”
SDG&E proposed the shutoff plan after state
investigators, including the CPUC, concluded it was SDG&E’s power
lines that sparked the wildfires that devastated San Diego County in
2007. SDG&E has been sued by residents who lost their homes and
municipalities seeking to recover hundreds of millions of dollars in
damages. So far, SDG&E has agreed to pay about $740 million to
settle lawsuits stemming from the wildfires.
Supporters of SDG&E’s plan say it is necessary to
prevent catastrophic wildfires in the future.
Commissioners John Bohn and Rachelle Chong are in
support of SDG&E’s position. Bohn argued at the meeting that, “it is
appropriate that they [SDG&E] make the decision on when a safety
hazard exists.”
Critics, however, argue it would leave vast parts of
the county without vital services during times of emergency,
including water pumping, telephones, radios and the use of medical
devices.
San Diego attorney Jennifer Haley, representing
opponents, said one reason the order was needed was to protect
disabled people.
SDG&E says 900 people in the affected area have chronic
medical problems, and 590 of them rely on life-sustaining electrical
equipment. Mike Niggli, SDG&E’s chief operating officer, said the
company hasn’t been able to reach 211 of the medically sensitive
customers.
But Niggli said it hasn’t been for lack of trying; they
have received multiple letters and five telephone calls each and
representatives have been sent to knock on doors.
Two competing recommendations are before the CPUC on
Sept. 10.
Earlier this month, administrative law judge Timothy
Kenney recommended that the CPUC reject SDG&E’s plan, stating that
the utility “has not met its burden to demonstrate that the benefits
of shutting off power outweigh the significant costs, burdens and
risks that would be imposed on customers and communities in the
areas where the power is shut off.”
Commissioner Timothy Simon recommended SDG&E be allowed
to implement the shutoff plan as a test until the end of the year
but that tough restrictions be imposed. The conditions include
giving affected residents 12 hours’ advance notice, limiting
blackouts to 24 hours, and getting the consent of state fire and
county emergency officials.
If implemented, the plan potentially could black out homes and
businesses, affecting more than 55,000 residents in parts of Alpine,
Lakeside, Poway, Escondido, Valley Center and Fallbrook. Customers
would be provided a six-hour notice under the SDG&E plan.
Also at the meeting, the CPUC adopted new rules aimed
at reducing fires caused by power lines, which have been blamed for
three of the major wildfires in 2007. Utility companies will be
required to trim trees and bushes farther back from wires than in
the past, place wires farther apart, and limit the number of wires
and transformers on a single pole.
E-mail
the Editor
|